Mitchell

CONSTITUENCY ( Borough )
Image credit, Library of Congress, Geography and Map Division

The small town of Mitchell in mid-Cornwall sat on the cross-roads of the main routes between St. Columb and Truro, and Launceston and St. Ives. In 1715, it was described as no more than a ‘small Hamlet, scarce containing thirty Houses’.[1] By the nineteenth century the town had shrunk even further, and only half of its surviving twenty-three houses were inhabited. Correspondingly, the electorate fell from 55 in 1754 to only 7 in 1831, leaving Mitchell as the third smallest constituency in England and consigned to disenfranchisement following the Reform Bill of 1832.

In many respects Mitchell was a quintessential pocket – and sometimes rotten – borough. In the late Stuart period, its archaic franchise left elections entirely in the hands of the lords of the manor, the Roman Catholic Arundell family of Lanherne. However, a sustained assault on this franchise by a body of often-disenfranchised inhabitants led to its replacement by one based on residency in the borough in 1689. Agents for the Arundell family attempted to persist with the traditional franchise during the 1690s, a struggle which is reflected in surviving poll sheets. There were no clear party divisions within the borough, but certain Whig candidates and local Dissenters became associated with the inhabitant-based franchise.

A scot and lot franchise was firmly established in 1701. Thereafter the principal interest in parliamentary elections was held by the portreeve, who served as returning officer. He was chosen out of the five major landowners in the borough known as ‘mesne’ lords. In 1760, Lord Edgcumbe claimed that the inhabitants were ‘in general low, indigent people, [who] will join such of the under Lords from whom they have reason to expect most money and favours’.[2] By 1796, various pieces of property had been sold off, leaving Viscount Falmouth and Sir Christopher Hawkins as the chief patrons of the borough – who tended to sell seats to supporters of the Administration. There were no contests between 1784 and 1831.


[1] Browne Willis, Notitia Parliamentaria: or, An History of the Counties, Cities, and Boroughs in England and Wales (2 vols., London, 1715), ii, 155.

[2] Lewis Namier, The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III (2nd edn, London, 1978), 304.


Householder Borough (until 1701), Scot and Lot Borough (from 1701)

In 1689, the House of Commons determined that the right to vote in Mitchell rested with the inhabitant householders not receiving alms (CJ, x, 306–7). However, throughout the 1690s, agents for the Arundell family of Lanherne persisted with the old, archaic franchise: at an election, the lord of the manor (the Arundells) selected two ‘elizors’ from the borough’s inhabitants, who, in turn, appointed a further 22 men to form a jury of electors. Support for the Arundells had crumbled by the turn of the century, and the Commons ruled in March 1701 that the right of election was in the inhabitants paying scot and lot (CJ, xiii, 416–17). The returning officer was the portreeve, who was selected out of the five major landowners in the borough – known as ‘mesne’ or ‘deputy’ lords – and the position was traditionally rotated between the families.

Timeline & Key Statistics

query { stats(constituency:"Mitchell"){ num_elections_all num_contested_general num_contested_by num_uncontested_general num_uncontested_by num_contested_all num_uncontested_all percent_contested_general percent_uncontested_general percent_contested_by percent_uncontested_by percent_contested_all percent_uncontested_all constituency_id } }query { stats(constituency:"all"){ num_elections_all num_contested_general num_contested_by num_uncontested_general num_uncontested_by num_contested_all num_uncontested_all percent_contested_general percent_uncontested_general percent_contested_by percent_uncontested_by percent_contested_all percent_uncontested_all } }
53 Elections

13
General
Contested

2
By Elections
Contested

19
General
Uncontested

19
By Elections
Uncontested
%
#

General elections
Contested Uncontested
Mitchell 40.6%13 59.4%19
England 33.7%2638 66.3%5200

By-elections
Contested Uncontested
Mitchell 9.5%2 90.5%19
England 17.5%671 82.5%3163

Total
Contested Uncontested
Mitchell 28.3%15 71.7%38
England 28.4%3317 71.6%8363

Cultural Artefacts


People & Places